From: Barbara Legate <blegate@legate.ca>
To: obligations@uwo.ca
Date: 14/10/2009 20:28:25 UTC
Subject: duty to fetus ruling in Ontario
Attachments: Endorsement of Justice W.U. Tausendfreund dated Oct. 14, 2009.pdf

A hot issue in Canada has been whether the ruling in Paxton v Ramji  relating to duties of a physician to a fetus, has impacted on duties owed in birth trauma cases. The defence bar has been taking this issue forward in British Columbia, and more recently in Ontario. I argued the issue under our rules to determine a point of law, that is, did the defendants owe a duty to the fetus while in utero. The decision of the court in Liebig v Guelph General Hospital et al is attached. The court ruled the defendants do owe such a duty.

 

Barbara Legate

 

blegate@legate.ca

 

 

Best Lawyers

 

 

Legate & Associates

 

 

Please visit us at: www.legate.ca

150 Dufferin Ave Suite 302
London, ON N6A 5N6
Tel: 519-672-1953
Fax: 519-672-6689

 

 

This e-mail may be privileged and/or confidential, and the sender does not waive any related rights and obligations. Any distribution, use or copying of this e-mail or the information it contains by other than an intended recipient is unauthorized. If you received this e-mail in error, please advise me (by return e-mail or otherwise) immediately.

Ce courrier électronique est confidentiel et protégé. L'expéditeur ne renonce pas aux droits et obligations qui s'y rapportent. Toute diffusion, utilisation ou copie de ce message ou des renseignements qu'il contient par une personne autre que le (les) destinataire(s) désigné(s) est interdite. Si vous recevez ce courrier électronique par erreur, veuillez m'en aviser immédiatement, par retour de courrier électronique ou par un autre moyen